
Note: I wrote this post with light hearted humor, and I don’t mean any offense to the respected bloggers.
Ever since Google came out openly with its stance about advertisers and link sellers who try to manipulate Google’s PageRank algorithm, there has been a great deal of unrest in the blogosphere. You can hear angry voices coming from virtually all directions.
I really find it laughable that many of the well reputed bloggers have succumbed to the temptation of crying foul against Google. They think Google has penalized them for selling links, OK fair enough. Wait.. they also think that Google is manually penalizing their site to rank low in SERPs, and that Google has unleashed sinister spies to trawl through the world wide web to catch the criminals red-handed. This is where their paranoia becomes evident.
Here are four reasons why their concerns are unfounded.
Google isn’t God (or a Satan) – Even though it feels good to think of Google as an omnipresent cyber entity, this really isn’t true. For one thing, human beings have the tendency of idolizing and demonizing certain individuals to the point that they lose their humanity. They become super-humans or sub-humans.
While Google isn’t an individual, and this whole argument isn’t taking place in the real world, our tendency to demonize an entity is still very much alive.
So why do you think Google would take the trouble of manually manipulating their algorithm to throw your site in the dark pits of obscurity? Google has better things to do than mess with individual bloggers who think very highly of themselves. Really, Google doesn’t care about you. All the ups and downs your site has seen are algorithmic changes. Don’t forget that, for Google, your site is just another site out of millions of millions of sites on the net. A few thousand subscribers do not make your site a pivotal point of Google’s decision making.
Warning: Google PR is updating – Wait till the update is over before you declare an all out war against Google’s evil regime. It is commonly observed that while Google PR is updating, the PR of many sites changes rather erratically. Heck, on the last PR update, one of my sites plummeted from PR4 to PR0, stayed like this for a whole week, and came back with PR5.
It’s a lot wiser to stay quiet and wait for things to settle down than go crying on webmasters forums that you have been penalized by the evil Google.
You don’t have evidence to support your claim – and personal experiences don’t count as evidence. You suddenly started ranking low for a keyword you always ranked high for? Nothing unusual. This happens all the time with thousands of sites, and they aren’t necessarily being penalized. Google gives everyone a fair share of traffic, and unluckily your turn is over.
Long nights at computer are taking their toll on you – You need a break. This has worked for me many times. Whenever I feel desperately paranoid and pessimistic, I unsticky myself from the chair, get out, and shut off any kinds of thoughts about my online life. Fresh gusts of outside air work wonders. When I come back, I am less paranoid and more willing to improve my sites, because, obviously, while I was being paranoid, my competitors were improving their sites.
The long and short of it is that Google changes its algorithm from time to time to deal with new black hat SEO techniques of mischievous webmasters. This, in essence, means that Google may actually be penalizing you for going against their policies, but it’s no warrant for you to start making premature claims about.. bah – getting manual penalty from Google?
My page rank hasn’t changed at all, but at this point I don’t care. Google traffic is coming along pretty nicely, around 10% of my total traffic.
Good post. I think many websites rely on google for traffic to generate their income, so they look to Google as an internet deity. I know many bloggers are very unhappy with the google buzz going around. They do make some good points.
Just fyi, I gave you a stumble thumbs up.
Cheers!
I love this post, there has been so much crying recently about this whole PR thing! I think you have a very valid point when you say that Google doesn’t care. In our own little niche its easy to think that the ‘big boys’ are very important but in the grand scheme of the entire Internet, even the bigger ones are still just drops in the ocean.
Jeremy, 10% is a bit low, isn’t it? You should work to increase it to at least 30%.
Thanks CHESSNOID. They make some good points, sure. But they also get carried away with the criticism and end up making absurd claims.
Caroline, well put! I am again reminded of how we tend to be arrogant and think that we are in the center of the grand scheme of the universe, although this clearly does not seem to be the case
Mohsin, that 10% is just Google traffic, I also get quite a bit from Yahoo (around 5%) and from other SEs as well (maybe another 2-5%). Around 15-20% of my total traffic is from search. Another 40-60% is from blogs, and the rest is social media, program and plugin sites/directories, direct type in (and clicks from Google Reader, bloglines, etc), and other sources.
I like keeping everything diversified, that way if one site or search engine (google for instance) decided to ban my site it won’t cause any major issues and the traffic can easily be made up for.
Plus I expect Google to increase to 15% sometime soon, it hasn’t yet taken into account some tweaks I did a couple of weeks ago.
Same here, still no update on PageRank on any site since summer. Google accounts for 23% of my traffic now, but no changes on rankings so far.
Your welcome Mohsin. My traffic is small so it really doesn’t affect me at this time. You have a high PR and seem not too concerned. Maybe it is about attitude on how you look at the situation.
I’m so glad that I’ve found this post (following a link on Caroline Middlebrook’s blog). It’s a pity not everyone wants to open their eyes. Anyway, I’ve just stumbled your article.
Jeremy, that’s good. Even making such small tweaks as optimizing the page titles can result in big search engine traffic boost.
Macro Richter, Google is up to something for sure. The PageRank is taking forever to update.
CHESSNOID, this blog is pretty new, so I do care about how Google sees it
Karen Zara, thanks a lot for the stumble
Finally managed to visit from Pro Blog Design! Great site, very attractive and easy to navigate.
Good article. That’s good to know that PR can be erratic when updating. I used to have PR4 (last time I checked was quite some time ago, but there’s no good reason it should have gone down). Now I have PR0, I hope that’s going to change soon! Not that it’s really very important, just a blow to my ego!
It also seems like it’s true that Google doesn’t care about you individually, which is good because then everyone gets the same treatment. However, apparently they do change penalties on an individual basis, I guess that’s also good for people who make a living from their site and unwittingly do something dodgy.
Did you know Danny Sullivan confirmed that Google was indeed penalizing the sites manually? And, did you know Matt Cutts personally “took care” of David Airey?
I’m not justifying anything here, just mentioning facts. You have a few interesting points too, but I beg to differ that Google doesn’t care – curbing link sales is important to them.
Sometimes people are just obsessed over Google PR.
PR being PR, it’s good if your monetization needs it but content should always be the focus.
kristarella, Google does penalize sites manually, but it’s when the site owners blatantly and openly game Google’s ranking algorithm. That’s like declaring war against Google.
Thanks for liking Blogging Bits. I hope to continue improving it
Karthik, didn’t Matt Cuts personally took care of getting his site to be re-indexed? Or did Matt explicitly say that he manually penalized David Airey’s site?
In any case, I think David Airey was being too irresponsible by openly using devious techniques to boost his search engine rankings for certain keywords, and was advertising it way too carelessly, so he had it coming
However, this doesn’t mean that every webmaster and blogger who notices even slight PR or search engine traffic decrease should jump to drastic conclusions
I couldn’t agree more goldfries. Good content invariably means good PR and higher SE rankings.
Mohsin, as a matter of fact, David Airey was indeed manually penalized by Google, and Matt Cutts is the public face of the company. I’d read the transcript between them a few days back and Matt particularly asked David if the links (that David had subsequently removed) were coming back, to which David said no. Only after which did Matt agree to get him back in the index.
Yes, David did make it very obvious that he was selling links, but who wasn’t? For the exception of Andy Beard, everyone else who’d been penalized openly advertised paid links.
Again, like I said, I’m not justifying anything at all, nor am I trying to be argumentative, just wanted to point out that the two examples that you’ve mentioned were indeed penalized specifically for selling links.
That said, it really is funny to see a lot of others making a fuss about their SERPs too – point taken.
Come on Karthik, you aren’t being argumentative. It’s a discussion, remember?
I admit you have a point, and I understand you get my point too. Basically, there have been a few cases of Google penalizing sites manually (John Chow comes to mind) but they are often the ones who openly advertise the fact that they are gaming the system to achieve higher rankings. See, if you make too much noise, chances are it will be heard in Google headquarters
Whereas some of the crowd that joined in the commotion that they are being penalized too, have only experienced a slight fluctuation in PR. This, IMO, is a little immature.
>>Come on Karthik, you aren’t being argumentative. It’s a discussion, remember?
Glad you took in the right spirit – I just didn’t want to get on the wrong side of anybody
>>Whereas some of the crowd that joined in the commotion that they are being penalized too, have only experienced a slight fluctuation in PR. This, IMO, is a little immature.
We have common ground then
Not to sound flattering, but you have a very nice blog going on here – just subscribed to your feed
Yeah I would have to agree that people do tend to jump to conclusions quite quickly but then again it would be hard not to if your site dropped in pagerank. Any ideas on when the pagerank update is going to happen? It has been forever since the last one.
According to what Matt Cutts told me, your headline is wrong.
I learnt a valuable lesson with my linkbaiting tactics, but agree with Karthik how my site had a manual penalty incurred, and that selling links was partly the reason.
Your post makes me appear to have been angry with Google, and that I think highly of myself. For the record, I’m just one humble person, who knows when I’m wrong and is the first to admit it.
I was wrong. I had my wrists slapped. I did all I could to make up for my wrong-doings, and was forgiven.
That’s all.
Thanks for dropping by David. I wasn’t referring to you at all when I said that some bloggers think very highly of themselves. In fact I had the other guy in mind (cough).
Honestly, I didn’t know that you were manually penalized by Google until Karthik told me, then I looked at the post on Matt’s blog where you discussed the situation, but there he didn’t mention that he manually took care of your site. But now that you confirm, I’ll remove your link.
No hard feelings
No hard feelings whatsoever, Mohsin.
I don’t want anyone thinking I’m overly concerned PR and what not, as I agree with many of your points in this post.
I hope you’re covering your mouth when you cough, because I think I might’ve caught a cold following your coughing on Armen’s blog.
Uh oh, looks like I’m in the thick of things here
@David
We all know you for the humble person that you are – I’m sure Mohsin didn’t mean the other way at all!
The way you describe it in the comment here and the thread over at “the other Matt’s” blog just goes to prove your humility – honestly, I highly respect it – its not often to see a person of your stature having his head sitting perfectly on his shoulder.
Oops, ignore my late comment, I started typing it before you David, but you beat me to it!
Thanks very much Karthik, for the kind words!
Hard to ignore your comment when you’re talking me up, which is always appreciated.
[quote comment="729"]I hope you’re covering your mouth when you cough, because I think I might’ve caught a cold following your coughing on Armen’s blog.[/quote]
Haha! I am glad the issue is resolved over at your blog as well as here
[quote comment="702"]Yeah I would have to agree that people do tend to jump to conclusions quite quickly but then again it would be hard not to if your site dropped in pagerank. Any ideas on when the pagerank update is going to happen? It has been forever since the last one.[/quote]
No Idea Mike. It’s taking forever to update. I think they are either going to abandon the PR thing after what people have done to it, or they are going to come out with a new PR calculating algorithm wrapped up in even more mysteries.
thanks for your posting, I take some useful information about google page rank and traffic….. up grade web regularly is very important
Hi,
Thanks for your post. I would like to inform you all from my experience.
The things that you have told is good as per the guidelines from google.
But if anybody take these steps into consideration, they won’t see their website into the top 10 for their business area in their life time.
What ever the reasons, Good link exchange campaign with related categories will have some good result first. I am not sure how many sites getting into the top SERP’s for latest new media.
But i request everybody to do not create any blogs for your own and give a link back to your websites from every post.
This is the biggest mistake and google surely penalize.
Create your own articles with some good content (Don’t copy from others) with in your knowledge and put it in all article sites with your website url.Then press releases will help you a lot.
This is for your kind info.
VenkaT